07.31.20

Cantwell, King, Manchin, Carper Push for Federal Review of Methane Emissions

Methane leaks are a major contributor to global warming; senators seek study from Government Accounting Office on state of energy industry, infrastructure

WASHINGTON, D.C. – This week, U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA), a senior member of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, joined Senators Angus King (I-ME), Joe Manchin (D-WV), and Tom Carper (D-DE) in requesting a comprehensive U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) review of current methane emissions from oil and gas development. In their letter to Gene Dodaro, Comptroller General of the GAO, the senators emphasized the importance of reducing methane leaks in the fight against climate change and called for the federal government to review and improve its technologies for measuring methane emissions. The senators also expressed concern that lower natural gas prices ushered in by the coronavirus pandemic will decrease the incentive for producers to capture and sell natural gas—which is primarily methane—and instead vent it into the atmosphere.

“To better understand how methane emissions from the oil and natural gas industry impacts human health and the environment, it is imperative to have a firm understanding of how much methane is actually released into the air, during both normal and abnormal operations,” the senators wrote.

According to the International Energy Agency, reducing methane leaks is the single most important and cost-effective way oil and gas companies can combat climate change. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), methane's impact on climate change is at least 25 times greater than that of CO2 when averaged over a 100-year time period. However, the senators wrote, “we do not have a clear picture of methane emissions in the United States.”

“While the COVID-19 economic downturn is widely expected to lead to a temporary decline in carbon dioxide emissions, it could have the opposite effect on methane emissions,” the senators continued. “Low prices for natural gas may mean that producers have less incentive to capture and sell natural gas, which is primarily methane, and vent it instead. Moreover, natural gas producers may put off fixing leaks because the cost of doing so exceeds the value of captured gas.”

At an Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing earlier this week, Senator Cantwell emphasized the importance and feasibility of stopping methane flaring, calling the reductions in the leaking and flaring of methane a “low-hanging fruit” that we already have the ability to address today. “I think that’s absolutely true. The technologies exist, we just need to deploy them,” agreed Sasha Mackler, the Director of The Energy Project at the Bipartisan Policy Center.

Senator Cantwell has a long history of fighting to prevent methane waste and promoting bold actions to address climate change. In 2017, Cantwell led the fight that successfully prevented the repeal of the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) Methane and Waste Prevention Rule using the Congressional Review Act (CRA). Following this victory, Cantwell kept up the pressure on Department of Interior Secretary Zinke when he suspended parts of the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) Methane and Waste Prevention Rule, questioning the Secretary, leading a bicameral group of 81 lawmakers in urging Secretary Zinke not to suspend or unlawfully delay implementation of the rule, and slamming the decision as an “ill-advised scheme.” And last year, Senator Cantwell joined 50 bicameral lawmakers in an amicus brief challenging the Trump Interior Department’s decision to revise and effectively reverse the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) 2016 Methane and Waste Prevention Rule.  Cantwell has also been working with Senator Udall (D-NM) to address methane leaks in our nation's natural gas pipelines by insisting that pending pipeline safety legislation require the use of the latest leak detection and prevention technologies.

The full text of the letter is available below and HERE.

Dear Mr. Dodaro:

We request that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) conduct a comprehensive review of methane emissions from oil and gas development, including prevention capabilities, emission measurements, enforcement of emission regulations, and estimates of foregone royalties associated with vented, flared, and leaked methane from federal leases.

The International Energy Agency has reported that the single most important and cost-effective way oil and gas companies can combat climate change is reducing methane leaks.[1]  Under the Clean Air Act, The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates emissions of air pollutants, including methane, and the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM) also regulates aspects of methane emissions from oil and gas development.  Methane is a primary component of natural gas and a greenhouse gas, and as such, its presence in the atmosphere affects the earth’s temperature and climate.  According to the EPA, methane's impact on climate change is at least 25 times greater than that of CO2 when averaged over a 100-year time period.[2] However, we do not have a clear picture of methane emissions in the United States.  In 2018, Science published a study that measured methane emissions from the U.S. oil and natural gas supply chain, and estimated emissions to be approximately 60 percent higher than the measurement from EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory.[3] We are concerned that the U.S. government may be relying on methods to measure methane emissions that are outdated and require improvement. 

Under the Minerals Leasing Act of 1920, BLM must ensure that Federal oil and gas lessees prevent undue waste of those resources.  In October 2010 and July 2016, GAO reported that Interior could take steps to better account for and manage methane emissions and issued several recommendations.  Interior took steps to implement GAO’s recommendations and in November 2016, issued regulations to reduce methane emissions.  In 2017 and 2018, however, Interior postponed, suspended, and eliminated certain requirements that would have potentially addressed GAO’s recommendations.  Recently, EPA indicated that it would soon issue two related final rules on methane emissions for oil and gas, revising and/or rescinding large portions of the 2016 rules.

To better understand how methane emissions from the oil and natural gas industry impacts human health and the environment, it is imperative to have a firm understanding on how much methane is actually released into the air, during both normal and abnormal operations. Therefore, we are requesting that GAO conduct a study and issue a comprehensive report on methane emissions. In conducting such a study, we request that the Comptroller General consult with the appropriate federal agencies responsible for the regulation and oversight of methane emissions, industrial actors, state and local environmental protection organizations, researchers, and non-governmental organizations that specialize in greenhouse gas research to evaluate and make recommendations to produce a comprehensive and consistent approach to measuring methane emissions. 

Further, while the COVID-19 economic downturn is widely expected to lead to a temporary decline in carbon dioxide emissions, it could have the opposite effect on methane emissions.  Low prices for natural gas may mean that producers have less incentive to capture and sell natural gas, which is primarily methane, and vent it instead.  Moreover, natural gas producers may put off fixing leaks because the cost of doing so exceeds the value of captured gas. 

In addition to any relevant recommendations, we specifically request that GAO examine and report on the following:

  1. How fugitive methane leaks are currently reported at the production and transportation phase and the state level;
  2. Differences between reporting and royalty requirements on methane emissions, intentional and unintentional, on federal, state, and privately-owned lands;
  3. What technology exists or is being developed to capture methane or reduce methane leaks during abnormal operations;
  4. Estimate the associated decreases in methane emissions using available technologies;
  5. Estimate the associated potential increases in federal royalty payments using available technologies to capture methane;
  6. What research is being done to improve methane leak prevention, measurement, and response;
  7. What technologies are used to measure methane emissions in both normal and abnormal operations;
  8. Any regulatory suggestions to improve the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory; 
  9. To what extent, if any, methane emissions have increased during the COVID-19 economic slowdown; and
  10. What ways public lands can be managed to better steward federal assets and support development of the methane capture industry.

We thank you for your attention to this important issue.

###